Deans' stroke musings: Motor imagery ability in stroke patients: the relationship between implicit and explicit motor imagery measures

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Motor imagery ability in stroke patients: the relationship between implicit and explicit motor imagery measures

I can't tell if this is trying to distinguish between action observation(watching someone elses movements) and visual imagery(imagining yourself doing a movement). So ask your brilliant doctor about it. Only 65 references that you can quiz your doctor about.
http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00790/full?

Sjoerd de Vries^1,2^*,

Marga Tepper³,

Wya Feenstra^3,4,

Hanneke Oosterveld¹,

Anne M. Boonstra⁴ and

Bert Otten¹

¹Centre for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
²Research Centre for Health, Social Work & Technology, School of Applied Psychology, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Deventer, Netherlands
³Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
⁴‘Revalidatie Friesland’ Centre for Rehabilitation, Beetsterzwaag, Netherlands

There is little consensus on how motor imagery ability should be measured in stroke patients. In particular it is unclear how two methods tapping different aspects of the motor imagery process relate to each other. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between implicit and explicit motor imagery ability by comparing performance of stroke patients and controls on a motor imagery questionnaire and a hand laterality judgment task (HLJT). Sixteen ischemic stroke patients (36 ± 13 weeks post-stroke) and 16 controls, matched by age (51 ± 10 years), gender (7 females) and handedness (3 left-handed), performed a HLJT and completed a motor imagery questionnaire. Our study shows that neither in the healthy controls nor in patients, a correlation is found between the HLJT and the motor imagery questionnaire.

Although the patient group scored significantly lower than the control group on the visual motor imagery component (U = 60; p = 0.010) and the kinesthetic motor imagery component (U = 63.5; p = 0.015) of the questionnaire, there were no significant differences between patients and controls on accuracy scores of the HLJT. Analyses of the reaction time profiles of patients and controls showed that patient were still able to use an implicit motor imagery strategy in the HLJT task.

Our results show that after stroke performance on tests that measure two different aspects of motor imagery ability, e.g., implicit and explicit motor imagery, can be differently affected. These results articulate the complex relation phenomenological experience and the different components of motor imagery have and caution the use of one tool as an instrument for use in screening, selecting and monitoring stroke patients in rehabilitation settings.

Lots more at the link.