Deans' stroke musings: Stroke patients after neurological inpatient rehabilitation: a prospective study to determine whether functional status or health-related quality of life predict living at home 2.5 years after discharge

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Stroke patients after neurological inpatient rehabilitation: a prospective study to determine whether functional status or health-related quality of life predict living at home 2.5 years after discharge

I absolutely hate these types of studies. Rather than solving real world stroke problems they figure out useless information that no survivors can use to drive them to recovery. Damn it, do some real work!
http://journals.lww.com/intjrehabilres/Abstract/publishahead/Stroke_patients_after_neurological_inpatient.99720.aspx

Graessel, Elmar; Schmidt, Ralf; Schupp, Wilfried

Published Ahead-of-Print

Abstract

We carried out a prospective study to determine whether stroke patients' functional status or health-related quality of life would predict whether they lived at home 2.5 years after discharge from neurological inpatient rehabilitation. We carried out a single-center prospective cohort study. The outcome 'home care' versus 'death' or 'institutionalization' (nursing home admission) was evaluated 30 months after discharge. A total of 204 stroke survivors with remaining moderate to severe functional deficits at admission to neurological inpatient rehabilitation were included. Clinical data were obtained at admission to and/or discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Functional status was determined using the Barthel Index; health-related quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 and EQ-5D. The outcome was assessed by telephone interview. Predictors of living at home were calculated using binary logistic regression analysis. In total, 30 months after discharge, 75% of the stroke survivors were still living at home. Multivariate analysis showed that patients continued to live at home significantly more frequently when they had fewer mortality-relevant comorbidities (P=0.001), a higher BMI (P=0.040), a higher increase in functional independence during inpatient rehabilitation (P=0.017), and above all, a better health-related quality of life, measured using the EQ-5D (P<0.001), at discharge. Stroke survivors' health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D and the change in functional status during multimodal neurological rehabilitation appear to be the strongest clinically relevant long-term predictors of staying at home.