Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Risk Factors for Poststroke Depression Identification of Inconsistencies Based on a Systematic Review

This is just so goddamned f*cking simple to identify the problem. Currently our doctors do not give us any objective diagnosis or any proven repeatable way to recover.  With such lack of information depression is inevitable. Stop the neuronal cascade of death and survivors will be much less disabled and less likely to get depressed. Solve the correct problem you blasted idiots.
http://jgp.sagepub.com/content/27/3/147?etoc
  1. Annemieke De Ryck, MScN1,2
  2. Raf Brouns, MD, PhD3
  3. Marleen Geurden, MScN1,2
  4. Monique Elseviers, PhD1,4
  5. Peter P. De Deyn, MD, PhD2,5,6
  6. Sebastiaan Engelborghs, MD, PhD2,6
  1. 1Department of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  2. 2Department of Neurology and Memory Clinic, ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim and Hoge Beuken, Antwerp, Belgium
  3. 3Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
  4. 4Heymans Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  5. 5Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Research Center, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
  6. 6Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behaviour, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  1. Annemieke De Ryck, Department of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp 2610, Belgium. Email: annemieke.deryck@student.uantwerpen.be

Abstract

Objective: Depression after stroke or poststroke depression (PSD) has a negative impact on the rehabilitation process and the associated rehabilitation outcome. Consequently, defining risk factors for development of PSD is important. The relationship between stroke and depression is described extensively in the available literature, but the results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review is to outline conflicting evidence on risk factors for PSD.
Methods: PubMed, Medline, and Web of Knowledge were searched using the keywords “stroke,” “depression,” and “risk factor” for articles published between January 01, 1995, and September 30, 2012. Additional articles were identified and obtained from a hand search in related articles and reference lists.
Results: A total of 66 article abstracts were identified by the search strategy and 24 articles were eligible for inclusion based on predefined quality criteria. The methodology varies greatly between the various studies, which is probably responsible for major differences in risk factors for PSD reported in the literature. The most frequently cited risk factors for PSD in the literature are sex (female), history of depression, stroke severity, functional impairments or level of handicap, level of independence, and family and social support.
Conclusions: Many risk factors are investigated over the last 2 decades and large controversy exists concerning risk factors for development of PSD. These contradictions may largely be reduced to major differences in clinical data, study population, and methodology, which underline the need for more synchronized studies.

No comments:

Post a Comment