Researchers Say They’ve Recreated Part of a Rat Brain Digitally

In the article you can read about the naysayers whom obviously are not among the 10 million stroke survivors a year needing answers as to how the brain works.  I don't give a shit that this is a BHAG(Big Hairy Audacious Goal). If we don't put these goals out there we just plod along doing nothing.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/09/science/rat-brain-digital-reconstruction-human-brain-project.html

Building on years of research, 82 researchers from institutions around the world reported Thursday that they had built a reconstruction of a section of a rat brain in a computer.

The research was partly supported by the Human Brain Project, a more than $1 billion, 10-year European research program. The report comes directly from the Blue Brain Project, which aims to reconstruct the rat brain and eventually the human brain in a computer.

Both research programs have been controversial. Hundreds of neuroscientists signed an open letter in 2014(naysayers here) criticizing both the overall project and the feasibility of the reconstruction goal.

Henry Markram, of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, who leads both projects, said that what he and his many colleagues had achieved was the first draft of a functioning map of 30,000 brain cells.

Continue reading the main story

Related Coverage

• European Effort for Computer-Simulated Brain Draws FireJULY 8, 2014   

• 

  Bringing a Virtual Brain to LifeMARCH 18, 2013

• 

  The Map Makers: The Brain’s Inner LanguageFEB. 24, 2014

• 

  The Map Makers: The Brain, in Exquisite DetailJAN. 6, 2014

• 

  The Map Makers: A Search for Self in a Brain ScanJAN. 6, 2014

He said this was not yet a proof of principle that scientists could indeed reconstruct the human brain, which contains 85 billion or more neurons, but that it was a first step.

Cori Bargmann, co-director of the new Kavli Neural Systems Institute at Rockefeller University, who has been intimately involved with the Brain Initiative, also a long-term research program, said the report represented an “amazing tour de force” in its accumulation of data.

But, she said, the “simulations are in their infancy,” and therefore what this means for the larger goals of reconstructing a whole brain is unclear. “They built a 747, and it’s taxiing around the runway,” she said. “I haven’t seen it fly yet, but it’s promising.”

The reconstruction that Dr. Markram envisions is a research tool that would digitally encode some characteristics of neurons and their connections that are common to all brains. It is not the futuristic dream of uploading a human personality to a computer.

To build a digital version of the portion of rat brain, researchers did not record the details of every single cell. They used the data from some cells to inform what the whole would look like. Then they simulated certain kinds of brain activity and found that the reconstruction acted like the living tissue. All the data for the reconstruction will be available for other scientists.

The report, published in Cell, a scientific journal, is one of the longest neuroscience reports ever, and several neuroscientists declined to comment before publication because of the time required to evaluate it fully.