Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Association of Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program Participation and Clinical Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries With Ischemic Stroke

This is completely and totally fucking worthless. By measuring guidelines instead of results you are insuring that improvements will not occur on a regular basis. 
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2016/04/13/STROKEAHA.115.011874.abstract

  1. Jeffrey L. Saver, MD
+ Author Affiliations
  1. From the Department of Neurology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (S.S.); Departments of Cardiology (G.C.F.) and Neurology (J.L.S.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas (D.M.O.); Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (L.L., P.J.S.) and Cardiology (A.F.H., E.D.P.), Duke University, Durham, NC; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing (M.J.R.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (E.E.S.); and Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (L.H.S.).
  1. Correspondence to Sarah Song, MD, MPH, Department of Neurology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 1121, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail sarah_song@rush.edu

Abstract

Background and Purpose—Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke is a national, hospital-based quality improvement program developed by the American Heart Association. Although studies have suggested improved processes of care in GWTG-Stroke–participating hospitals, it is not known whether this improved care translates into improved clinical outcomes compared with nonparticipating hospitals.(You can't compare GWTG hospitals against each other)
Methods—From all acute care US hospitals caring for Medicare beneficiaries with acute stroke between April 2003 and December 2008, we matched hospitals that joined the GWTG-Stroke program with similar hospitals that did not. Using a difference-in-differences design, we analyzed whether hospital participation in GWTG-Stroke was associated with a greater improvement in clinical outcomes compared with the underlying secular change.
Results—The matching algorithm identified 366 GWTG-Stroke–adopting hospitals that cared for 88 584 acute ischemic stroke admissions and 366 non–GWTG-Stroke hospitals that cared for 85 401 acute ischemic stroke admissions. Compared with the Pre period (18–6 months before program implementation), in the Early period (0–6 months after program implementation), GWTG-Stroke hospitals had accelerated increases in discharge to home and reduced mortality at 30 days and 1 year. In the Sustained period (6–18 months after program implementation), the accelerated reduction in mortality at 1 year was sustained, with a trend toward sustained accelerated increase in discharge home.
Conclusions—Hospital adoption of the GWTG-Stroke program was associated with improved functional outcomes at discharge and reduced postdischarge mortality.

No comments:

Post a Comment